Add Row 
Add 
Florida’s Public Adjusters Stand Firm Against Coercive Endorsements
In a significant move aimed at protecting policyholders, the Florida Association of Public Insurance Adjusters (FAPIA) and the National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters (NAPIA) have filed a lawsuit against Velocity Risk Underwriters for imposing anti-public adjuster endorsements in Florida’s property insurance policies. This bold action comes amidst growing frustrations over practices that dissuade consumers from seeking the assistance of professional public adjusters.
Understanding the Legal Battle
The lawsuit, lodged in Miami-Dade Circuit Court, highlights claims that Velocity Risk, a managing general agent for several out-of-state insurers, has instituted policy language that prohibits policyholders from hiring public adjusters. The endorsement states that by engaging the services of a public adjuster, the insured risks losing their coverage. This coercive tactic allegedly forces policyholders, already vulnerable after damage to their property, into giving up essential representation.
According to the complaint, Velocity has instructed field adjusters to refuse communication with public adjusters, reject documentation from them, and halt claims processing until proof is provided that the public adjuster has been terminated. This creates a heavyweight environment where policyholders may feel compelled to navigate the often complex insurance claims process alone, which typically leads to unfavorable outcomes.
What's at Stake for Policyholders?
The fight against these endorsements is not just about one lawsuit; it's about balancing the scales of power in the insurance industry. For many Floridians, public adjusters serve as essential advocates who help secure fair settlements from often unyielding insurance companies. The endorsements raise alarms that insurers are infringing on policyholders' rights to professional representation, thus jeopardizing their chances of receiving just compensation for losses.
The Legal Framework Supporting Public Adjusters
FAPIA and NAPIA’s legal challenge relies heavily on the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA), which they argue has been violated by the deceptive nature of these endorsements. Under Florida law, insurers cannot deny coverage without proving that the policyholder's actions caused significant harm to the insurer's interest, and merely hiring a public adjuster does not meet that criterion. The associations are also seeking a declaratory judgment that these endorsements are against Florida public policy, supporting the work public adjusters do on behalf of their clients.
Coercive Practices Under Scrutiny
The lawsuit delineates three main claims against Velocity: first, the violation of FDUTPA due to deceptive practices; second, a request for a declaratory judgment stating that the endorsements are void; and third, an assertion that such practices amount to antitrust violations under the Florida Antitrust Act. By effectively boycotting public adjusters through collective agreement with partner insurers, the complaint highlights a disturbing trend towards monopolizing the post-loss adjustment process.
Implications for Consumers and Public Adjusters
What does this all mean for everyday South Carolinians who are still wading through the complexities of property damage claims? It's essential to recognize that insurance companies may resort to manipulative practices to curb costs, particularly under pressure from their own profit margins. The struggle against anti-public adjuster endorsements underscores the critical need for vigilance and advocacy for consumer rights in the face of shifting industry standards.
Public adjusters provide invaluable service, stepping in to mitigate the power imbalance that often favors insurers. If the lawsuit yields a favorable outcome, it could set a powerful precedent that affirms both the role of public adjusters and the rights of policyholders in Florida and beyond.
Conclusion: Protect Your Rights
If you are navigating the property damage claims process, remember that you have rights, and there are resources available to help you advocate for yourself. Understanding the implications of the ongoing legal battles surrounding endorsements that restrict access to public adjusters can empower you to make informed decisions about your claims. For those currently dealing with claim denials, delays, or uncertainty in your claims process, consider seeking guidance from a professional. Advocate for yourself and ensure you are not left without necessary representation at a time when you need it most.
Write A Comment