Add Row 
Add 
A Bold Challenge to Insurer Practices Unpacking the Lawsuit Against Velocity Risk
In a significant lawsuit unfolding in Florida's Complex Business Division, two major public adjusting associations, the Florida Association of Public Insurance Adjusters (FAPIA) and the National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters (NAPIA), have decided to take a firm stand against expected insurance company tactics. The case against Velocity Risk Underwriters, LLC, highlights a troubling trend among insurers— the use of endorsements barring policyholders from hiring public adjusters, which raises vital questions on consumer rights and fair practice.
The Crux of the Issue: The Anti-Public Adjuster Endorsements
At the heart of the lawsuit is an endorsement stipulating that policyholders “shall not hire, engage, retain, contract with, or otherwise utilize the services of a public adjuster” for any covered loss. This creates a severe barrier for homeowners, who often need the expertise of public adjusters to navigate the complexities of insurance claims.
Such tactics have the effect of coercing policyholders into abandoning their rights to professional representation. If policyholders choose to employ a public adjuster, they face the threat of coverage forfeiture, as Velocity Risk allegedly halts claim processing and refuses to communicate with public adjusters. By doing so, they undermine a system that should support policyholders in receiving the compensation they rightly deserve from insurers.
Legal Implications and Claims Made
The plaintiffs assert that Velocity’s actions violate the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA), which aims to protect consumers from misleading practices. The lawsuit urges the court to declare the endorsement void, arguing that it is not only contrary to Florida law but also infringes upon the recognized role of public adjusters as legitimate representatives of policyholders. This raises concerns regarding fairness and transparency in the claims process.
Fighting Back Against Unfair Insurance Practices
Public adjusting associations see this legal confrontation as an essential action not just for their profession, but as a fight for all consumers’ rights. The court is being asked to affirm that these anti-public adjuster endorsements mislead policyholders into believing that hiring legal representation would jeopardize their claims.
Moreover, FAPIA and NAPIA argue that these endorsements violate Florida law, which prohibits insurers from enforcing post-loss conditions that could unfairly deny coverage. In the past, courts have recognized public adjusting as a valid and necessary occupation and have ruled that public adjusters should be supported, not obstructed.
The Larger Context: An Antitrust Narrative
While the case revolves around specific endorsements, it reflects a significant issue within the insurance industry—an apparent trend of isolating policyholders from professional representation. This raises ethical questions akin to antitrust violations, suggesting that there may be collusion among insurers to suppress competition. By cooperating with out-of-state insurers to impose these restrictive clauses across surplus lines policies, Velocity and its partners could be infringing on fair trade practices.
The implications are vast; if allowed to stand, they present a grim outlook for policyholder rights and could establish a dangerous precedent where insurers exert greater control over the claims process.
What This Means for South Carolinians
For residents of South Carolina navigating property damage claims, this lawsuit serves as a reminder of the importance of understanding your rights as an insured party. Insurance companies often employ tactics to diminish the value of claims, making this legal development crucial for any homeowner seeking to protect their rights. Consumers should be empowered with information on how to combat claim denials and avoid falling victim to unfair insurance practices.
As this litigation unfolds, it emphasizes the necessity for transparency and fairness in the insurance claims process—principles that ideally should govern the relationship between insurers and policyholders.
Educating Yourself: Steps to Protect Your Insurance Rights
As South Carolinians face the challenges of property damage claims and potential delays in settlements, taking proactive measures to educate oneself is essential. Here are key actions to consider:
- Understand your policy: Familiarize yourself with the terms and conditions, especially regarding hiring professionals for representation.
- Document everything: Keep accurate records of all correspondence and transactions related to your claim.
- Seek professional help: Consider employing a public adjuster — a licensed professional — to support your claims process.
- Know your rights: Familiarize yourself with state laws concerning insurance practice to better protect against unfair tactics.
These steps can empower you while navigating the complex world of insurance claims, ensuring you aren’t at a disadvantage when dealing with your insurer.
Final Thoughts
As public adjusters mobilize against what they view as coercive and unjust practices in the insurance industry, their actions provide an important precedent that affirms the rights of policyholders. By standing against restrictive endorsements and advocating for fairness, they highlight the crucial role that public adjusters play in helping insured parties navigate their claims. Staying informed and vigilant is key to safeguarding your rights as a consumer in South Carolina.
Write A Comment