Add Row 
Add 
Understanding Marine Cargo Policies: The Case of ABO Pharmaceuticals
If you’re a South Carolina resident involved in property damage claims, your knowledge of insurance policies could mean the difference between a successful claim and a frustrating denial. A recent case, Atlantic Business Corporation d/b/a ABO Pharmaceuticals v. RLI Insurance Company, presents a compelling example of how the language in marine cargo insurance can lead to costly misunderstandings.
The Fragility of Cargo: A Lesson in Detail
ABO Pharmaceuticals purchased a valuable shipment of blood plasma paste, known for its temperature sensitivity. To protect this cargo, they secured coverage under RLI’s Marine Open Cargo policy. However, when complications arose with shipping protocols, the plasma spoiled, leading to a massive $3 million claim. RLI denied coverage, citing specific policy terms that fell victim to legal scrutiny.
As it turns out, the explicit wording of insurance policies often holds more power than the general intent behind broader coverage promises. In this case, the “Delay Warranty,” “Temperature Warranty,” and other specific conditions superseded the more generalized phrase “from any cause,” leading to a deniable situation for ABO.
The Role of Clear Contract Language in Insurance
This situation illustrates an essential point about insurance contracts: clarity is key. The Eleventh Circuit Court ruled that when contract terms are clear and unambiguous, the law requires them to be enforced as written. Although “from any cause” may seem all-encompassing, it was effectively narrowed by specific warranties included in the policy. This case exemplifies just how crucial it is for policyholders to understand the very words that govern their coverage.
Creative Arguments and Legal Tactics
ABO’s legal team employed various arguments, suggesting that the warranty aimed at eliminating risk from delays could be interpreted as not excluding the deterioration caused by such delays. They even called upon the freight forwarder’s experience and expectations regarding coverage. However, the court dismissed these arguments, asserting that subjective interpretations do not hold weight against the policy's explicit language.
Navigating Insurance Claims: Protect Your Rights
The insight from the ABO Pharmaceuticals case offers invaluable lessons for South Carolinians. Understanding the nuances of your insurance policy is essential. Each word can carry significant implications for how claims are handled and whether you will face an insurance claim denial. Knowing your rights and the ways in which insurance companies may attempt to sidestep their obligations can empower you to fight against bad faith practices.
Given that insurers frequently employ tactics that lead to claim denials—whether through overly technical legal language or strategic delays—having an informed perspective can make a world of difference when it’s time to file a claim.
Taking Action Against Denials
Should you find yourself confronted with a denial, remember that you have options. Document everything meticulously—this includes communication with your adjuster and detailed records of your shipment's condition and transport. Utilize your rights to dispute unfair decisions, and consider seeking guidance from professionals who specialize in insurance claims to navigate the complex legal landscape.
As the court illustrated in the ABO case, understanding your policy and its language intimately not only prepares you for the worst but equips you to demand the coverage you deserve.
Conclusion: Know Your Insurance Rights
The lessons learned in Atlantic Business Corporation v. RLI Insurance underscore the importance of vigilance when dealing with insurance matters. Protect your insurance rights by being proactive: scrutinize policy details, document ever step of the claims process, and don’t hesitate to question practices that seem unfair. The stakes are high, and as the saying goes, knowledge is power.
Write A Comment